Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 00:34:22 -0800 (PST) From: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@cdsnet.net> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD performance vs BSD/OS Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960328003117.16907d-100000@schizo.cdsnet.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
W/o any real hard numbers, I noticed that when running the perl 5.002 testsuite that BSD/OS 2.0 on a P5-90 runs the tests more quickly than my P5-120 running -stable. BSD/OS 2.0.1 numbers for make test: All tests successful. u=0.65 s=1.03333 cu=11.8667 cs=12.6833 files=94 tests=2105 FreeBSD 2.1-stable numbers: All tests successful. u=1 s=1.8 cu=26.0667 cs=15.5 files=94 tests=2103 I do not know why the number of tests differ, unless it's related to dynamic loading turned on in FreeBSD and static in BSD/OS. outside of the dynamic vs static settings, everything else was defaulted. Of course, there are compiler differences and such Not really anything to get excited about, just a datapoint.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960328003117.16907d-100000>