Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 19:40:15 +1100 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au> To: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: arpresolve errors Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.961120193100.8206M-100000@panda.hilink.com.au> In-Reply-To: <96Nov19.215218pst.177558@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 19 Nov 1996, Bill Fenner wrote: I wrote: > >Are messages like the one below indicative of mbuf problems, or something > >else? > > Generally they're indicative of routing problems. > >"arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 203.x.y.49" > > What's the routing table look like for 203.x.y.49? 203.x.y.48/28 203.x.y.49 UGc 203.x.y.49 203.x.y.34 UH 203.s.t 203.x.y.49 UGc > >A check through the messages file > >shows that it only happens to CSLIP links which are gateways to remote > >nets/subnets. > > Are you using gated? gated likes to add bogus host routes which confuse > the routing table. There's code in 2.2 that handles this. Yes, I am using gated. Yes, there are host routes, but they seem to make sense (e.g. the one listed above) for the point to point links. And the PPP-connected networks on this and another 2.1.5R terminal server have *not* exhibited this [arpresolve] behaviour, although the routing entries are equivalent. Thanks, Danny
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.961120193100.8206M-100000>