Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 23:26:39 -0500 (EST) From: Intuitive Design Info <info@in-design.com> To: Ron Bickers <rbickers@intercenter.net> Cc: isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: senmail vs. qmail Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970205232546.6612A-100000@nero.in-design.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.95.970205153846.8266A-100000@bigboy.intercenter.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 5 Feb 1997, Ron Bickers wrote: > Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 15:43:03 -0500 (EST) > From: Ron Bickers <rbickers@intercenter.net> > To: Intuitive Design Info <info@in-design.com> > Cc: isp@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: senmail vs. qmail > > On Wed, 5 Feb 1997, Intuitive Design Info wrote: > > > Sendmail holes are endless. > > is there anyway to have qmail to do virtual emails? > > if yes, how have others found it's stability, etc? > > I've been running qmail on FreeBSD and BSDI for many months now and have > had zero stability problems. > > I'm using the qmsmac package for virtual domain email and once you get use > to the differences (and they are significant) qmail is a piece of cake to > maintain. I looked on cdrom, and I couldn't find either package. Could you give me a location where I could find both by any chance. Thanks Tamer Ziady
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.970205232546.6612A-100000>