Date: Sat, 22 Feb 1997 02:38:44 -0800 (PST) From: Vincent Poy <vince@mail.MCESTATE.COM> To: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: Snob Art Genre <ben@narcissus.ml.org>, Cliff Addy <fbsdlist@revelstone.jvm.com>, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: newer pine? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970222023751.205A-100000@mail.MCESTATE.COM> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.94.970221235342.421P-100000@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 21 Feb 1997, Doug White wrote: > On Fri, 21 Feb 1997, Snob Art Genre wrote: > > > > 3.95 will compile file if you specify the 'netbsd' target. The mouse > > > stuff will complain but it doesn't work too well anyway -- you would be > > > the better to disable it. This box is actually using 3.94 without any > > > major problems, and our master mail server is on 3.95 with likewise, no > > > probs to report. > > > > Do you know if it shipped with 2.1.7? > > Assuming the ftp site is the current state of affairs, there is a > ports-2.1.7 -> ports-2.1.6 symlink in place which I would assume means > that there will be no updated ports for 2.1.7. This is naturally an > assumption and should be taken with a large container of salt handy. Now a good question is how does one get the ports tree for 2.1.7 on a machine? I know in -current, using cvsup will do the -current ports tree. Cheers, Vince - vince@MCESTATE.COM - vince@GAIANET.NET ________ __ ____ Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / | / |[__ ] GaiaNet Corporation - M & C Estate / / / / | / | __] ] Beverly Hills, California USA 90210 / / / / / |/ / | __] ] HongKong Stars/Gravis UltraSound Mailing Lists Admin /_/_/_/_/|___/|_|[____]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.970222023751.205A-100000>