Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 07:15:32 +1000 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@hilink.com.au> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: FreeBSD parsing in Squid. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980417071515.19363X-100000@ns.hilink.com.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 16:58:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Yee Man Chan <ymc@eecs.umich.edu> To: Squid Developers' E-mail Group <squid-dev@nlanr.net> Subject: FreeBSD parsing Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 13:58:37 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: squid-dev@nlanr.net Hi, I run squid 1.1.20 at FreeBSD 4.4. According to the response time return from client, it is TEN TIMES SLOWER than I run it at SunOS v5. When I compare the result from gprof, I find that squid spent considerably amount of time (22.9%) in parseIntegerValue, decode_addr, aclParseIpData, safe_inet_addr, storeDirClean, urlParse, parseHttpRequest and sscanf at FreeBSD while only 3.7% of time spent in the same trace of code. Can anyone tell me why? Thanks. Yee Man Chan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.980417071515.19363X-100000>