Date: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 20:52:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: Mohit Aron <aron@cs.rice.edu> Cc: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@americantv.com>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: paper on improving webserver performance Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990707205032.23943m-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <199907080346.WAA27087@cs.rice.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999, Mohit Aron wrote: > > > > > This seems to indicate that you still have the overhead where the timer > > fires, but no events are actually pending. > > True, but it avoids any pointer manipulations when timers are set and cancelled > by TCP (which happens much more). Only if a timer is set by TCP that needs to > fire earlier than the time that the timing wheel event handler needs to fire > would you need to move around the timing wheel event. > > In any case, I'm very interested in your implementation since you appear to > have seen faster performance results with it. I might add that both have seen faster when compared with the existing, and both seem quite clever. I like the memory saving scheme too.. basically a "zombie tcp session" :-) > > > > - Mohit > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.990707205032.23943m-100000>