Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 18 Jun 1997 10:15:01 -0400 (EDT)
From:      listuser <listuser@h2o.journey.net>
To:        "Tom T. Thai" <tomthai@future.net>
Cc:        "John T. Farmer" <jfarmer@sabre.goldsword.com>, dennis@etinc.com, map@iphil.net, isp@FreeBSD.ORG, jfarmer@goldsword.com
Subject:   Re: Comparison
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970618101343.25343B-100000@h2o.journey.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSD.3.91.970617160840.707A-100000@dream.future.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The most cost effective Ascend MAX is the 4048.. It comes with T1/PRI
software and 48 K56 modems and the CSU's for two T1's...

(Infact it works great :)

I also have 4002's and 4004's and have a MAX TNT on order for a large pop
I am building..

--Matt

On Tue, 17 Jun 1997, Tom T. Thai wrote:

> I believe you can with the right drivers.  For instance, take a PRI/T1 
> card with MVIP interface and hook it up to a 24 highdensity card via the 
> MVIP interface.  ISDN is handled by the T1/PRI card and if it detects 
> analog, it passes the call to the analog modem card.  The hardware is out 
> there, but no drivers.
> 
> On Tue, 17 Jun 1997, John T. Farmer wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On Tue Jun 17 11:06:51 1997 dennis said:
> > >At 01:57 PM 6/17/97 +0800, you wrote:
> > >>Hi,
> > >>
> > >>Jon Lewis wrote:
> > >>> I wonder if ET has considered such a thing based on their sync cards?  My
> > >>> guess is there's so much extra hardware and software involved that anyone
> > >>> making one of these as a PC card to be used under Unix or NT is unlikely.
> > >
> > >This is non-sense, but the market for unix is way too small and NT probably
> > >doesnt have the hooks to do it properly. It IS a big project, and to do EI
> > >would
> > >require getting tons of approvals and testing sites......but channelized T1 is
> > >more reasonable. We dont plan on doing it though. Can't do everything, and 
> > >selling unix into high-end scenarios is a tough job.
> > >
> > >>
> > >>Perhaps.  However I am interested, and I'm sure many other folks are,
> > >>in the interests of ease-of-management.  Channelized E1 gear such as
> > >>the Ascend MAX 4000 support a whole lot of stuff like ISDN and frame 
> > >>which we cannot use anyway, but add to the cost (fantastic!)
> > 
> > I'm coming into this in the middle so to speak, and so I'm not sure what
> > exactly was being discussed but it sounds like it's related to something
> > that I'm interested in, that is ISDN interfaces for BRI & PRI that will
> > operate under FreeBSD.
> > 
> > So far, what I've seen are some older cards that used to work under FreeBSD.
> > 
> > What I would like to be able to do is to use it for PPP & MPP.  If it could
> > accept "voice/modem" calls (aka k56) that would be a win also.  I suppose
> > that what I want is to able to add the ability of an Ascend 1800 or 2000
> > to a FreeBSD box :^> (Max 1800 handles 8 BRI's, supports upto 16 64k ppp
> > links for ~ $6k.  Add ~$5k & it supports 16 k56/33.6 channels.  The 2000
> > does the same using a PRI.)
> > 
> > So any ideas?
> > 
> > John
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > John T. Farmer			Proprietor, GoldSword Systems
> > jfarmer@goldsword.com		Public Internet Access in East Tennessee
> > dial-in (423)470-9953		for info, e-mail to info@goldsword.com
> > 	Network Design, Internet Services & Servers, Consulting
> > 
> 
> 
> ..............          ....................................
> Thomas T. Thai          Infomedia Interactive Communications
> tom@iic.net             TEL 612.376.9090 * FAX 612.376.9087
> 
> 
> 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.970618101343.25343B-100000>