Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 24 Jan 1998 13:25:36 -0800 (PST)
From:      Tom <tom@sdf.com>
To:        "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM>
Cc:        Dag-Erling Coidan Sm rgrav <dag-erli@ifi.uio.no>, Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: IPv6 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980124131602.19914B-100000@misery.sdf.com>
In-Reply-To: <199801242051.PAA05411@whizzo.TransSys.COM>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Sat, 24 Jan 1998, Louis A. Mamakos wrote:

> > Remember that very soon, IPv6 will no longer be science-fiction or
> > just a nifty toy, but a necessity. We are this >< close to exhausting
> > the current 32-bit address space...
> 
> Uh, there is a big chunk of address space, previously identified as "class-A"
> addresses, available.  If you're going to worry about reasons for moving
> to IPv6, address space exhaustion in the next few years isn't one of them.

  Amen to that.  There are _huge_ blocks available on the low end of
address space.  For example 2/8 is reserved.  That's 16 million addresses.

  Also some organizations have wasted a lot of space, probably because
they aren't willing to re-allocate address space.  For example, IBM has
9/8.  I really doubt that IBM has 16 million hosts on the Internet, even
with their Advantis Internet Service.  Also, most of IBM is firewalled and
can only reach the net via a proxy server!  So IBM is giving out perfectly
good 9/8 addresses to workstations that only can reach the Internet via a
proxy server in some other non-9/8 block!

  It appears that BBN has two class A blocks, 4/8 and 8/8.  They only
appear to have recently started to allocated 4/8 it seems...

Tom




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.980124131602.19914B-100000>