Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 23:39:17 +0800 (WST) From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@obiwan.creative.net.au> To: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Hollywood (Re: PATCH.M ) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980211233025.1744A-100000@obiwan.creative.net.au> In-Reply-To: <199802111308.FAA02308@rah.star-gate.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 11 Feb 1998, Amancio Hasty wrote: > I sure hope that if someone decides to use FreeBSD in a major project > such as the making of the Titanic that NFS works 8) I just read the nt/win95 thread and I'm trying to figure out where it says -current has to be stable. Linux isn't stable all the time. I mean hey, I can give you so many examples where someone changed something in the kernel source, the kernel goes out, and then things break. And then Linus announces a new kernel 12 hours later with the 'fix'. But its tried. If she no work, then they back the change out. Its worked for them.. you try the ideas out. If it doesn't work in -current, you back it out. Or fix it until it does. Then you bring it into -release. Or have I like missed something totally about how its meant to work? </RANT> -- Adrian Chadd | "I used to be thin, handsome and smart. <adrian@creative.net.au> | Then I discovered UNIX." | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.980211233025.1744A-100000>