Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Nov 2001 19:12:51 -0500 (EST)
From:      doug <doug@safeport.com>
To:        Giorgos Keramidas <charon@labs.gr>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvsup question
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.1011127185106.50019F-100000@fledge.watson.org>
In-Reply-To: <20011127231220.GB11957@hades.hell.gr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
First I appreciate your response(s).

Actually I am not sure it is a bug - just that cvsup does not work as I
had thought. It would seems to me that the CVS tag lines (correct term??)
in the source were not updated. 

I just thought I would pursue this issue because I was depending on
something that did not work as I had thought. I.e. that the date tag
worked on a timestamp (and I guess that all mirrors used ntpd ;)

On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:

> > There should be no timing issue. In my example
> > all time are Zulu.
> > 
> > Using the cvsup date tag format: at 2001.11.25.15 (or later) I ran a
> > cvsup with no date tag. I observed that the latest mod I picked up was
> > 2001.11.24.19+. So to get something that (I thought) would be
> > reproducible I ran another cvsup with a tag of 2001.11.25.00.00.00.
> > Much earlier than the time of the 2nd cvsup.
> > 
> > I did not get tags anywhere near the boundary times rather I got:
> > 
> >   Add delta 1.291.2.22 2001.11.02.16.45.05 
> >   Add delta 1.74.2.6 2001.11.23.13.13.19 
> >   Add delta 1.5 99.08.28.01.01.30
> >   Add delta 1.5.2.2 2001.07.22.12.40.55
> >   Add delta 1.4 99.08.28.01.16.04
> 
> This seems definitely wrong.  Especially the deltas from 99.08.28.*.

I assumed this to be human error - I was just surprised they made it in my
update. I probably would not have noticed except they were the ONLY
changes.  Given the number of people, the change rate, and the complexity,
I think it all works pretty well. Note none of this caused a problem -
just was strange and I was depending on the date tag to do something it
(obviously) does not do.

> I hope this is not a bug in CVSup that bites you.  What version of
> CVSup are you running.  There was an update this autumn, for a bug
> caused by the 1-billionth second.

I am using cvsup-16.1d. This does not seems like those kinds of tolerances
were involved :)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.1011127185106.50019F-100000>