Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 09:17:24 +0400 (MSD)
From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To: nnd@itfs.nsk.su
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: PPP - why set CLOCAL for server ('-direct' mode) ?
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970911091443.523B-100000@nagual.pp.ru>
In-Reply-To: <5v7qoq$4ne@news.itfs.nsk.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11 Sep 1997 nnd@itfs.nsk.su wrote: > Андрей Чернов <ache@nagual.pp.ru> wrote: > > On 10 Sep 1997 nnd@itfs.nsk.su wrote: > > > > (from small script setted as as user's shell) > > > then it sets 'CLOCAL' flag for modem and > > > as a result 'ppp' process does'nt received 'SIGHUP' > > > on modem's carrier drop. > > > It not supposed to receive SIGHUP since modem line is not controlling > > terminal in any case. Carrier detected by TIOCM_CD instead. > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^ > | > Sorry, but is this (|) really the case when 'ppp -direct' > was started as a user's shell from getty ? Of course, not for -direct mode which suppose just stdin/stdout without any modem control. I do not understand one thing: if you use -direct mode, why modem code is even called? It is a bug indeed. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@null.net> http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970911091443.523B-100000>