Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 21:23:20 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-etc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc master.passwd Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971027211818.1060A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> In-Reply-To: <199710271803.LAA00863@rocky.mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 27 Oct 1997, Nate Williams wrote: > It's *worse* to change nobody to be effectively 'daemon'. It's alot Why is is worse? Nobody used only by daemons normally. > easier (and better) to give Apache a new user then to make nobody > 'daemon'. (Think NFS, among other things.) Forget about Apache, it simple reveals the bug. Lets talk about tftpd and fingerd conflict. Your suggestion will be make yet another nobody still? > No, nobody means 'nobody'. Apache is a 'daemon', so if that's not > appropriate, create a new user for it. Either that or disable fingerd > on machines where Apache is running. tftpd is daemon too. Lets disable tftpd on fingerd machines. Or vice versa. Or make yet another 100 nousers to satisfy each daemon which need it. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nietzsche.net> http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.971027211818.1060A-100000>