Date: Sun, 9 Nov 1997 13:50:34 -0800 (PST) From: "Jamil J. Weatherbee" <jamil@trojanhorse.ml.org> To: mika ruohotie <bsdhack@shadows.aeon.net> Cc: perlsta@cs.sunyit.edu, freebsd@atipa.com, cmott@srv.net, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IDT processors? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971109134621.1801A-100000@trojanhorse.ml.org> In-Reply-To: <199711092054.WAA17476@shadows.aeon.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Did anyone ever notice that 80386 backwards in 68308, does that mean that intel crap is just ass backwards motorola 68000's? What is the highest 68000 at this time 68400? How fast? In my opinion, gaining performance by making a hotter more complicated cpu is no kind of solution. We should of gone multiprocessing back on the 386's. It is still not a solution either because I dont believe in any computer that has moving parts when it comes to reliablity. The machine should be completly sealed from the environment (no dust) and fully submersible (more or less). On Sun, 9 Nov 1997, mika ruohotie wrote: > > ALPHA, get that freebsd port done! > > why would anyone want to use anything else than r10000? > > now, _that_ would be a port i'd like to see, freebsd on SGI platform. > > how likely is it? > > > mickey >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.971109134621.1801A-100000>