Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 15:11:29 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Dmitrij Tejblum <dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: amanda port, empty PATCH_STRIP= lines causes trouble Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980119150828.18158A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> In-Reply-To: <199801191008.NAA01615@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 19 Jan 1998, Dmitrij Tejblum wrote: > [CC list trimmed] > > Андрей Чернов wrote: > > I repeat (already many > > times) that both new and old patch handle Index: equally. > > I don't believe it. From src/contrib/patch/NEWS: > > Changes in version 2.4: > [...] > * The method used to intuit names of files to be patched is changed again: > `Index:' lines are normally ignored for context diffs, > [...] Better check than spread rumors, don't be lazy and run some tests at least. To be precise I mean "the stuff related to Index: lines" handled equally in 2.1 and 2.5 patch versions. I mean _original_ GNU versions, not modified in FreeBSD. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nietzsche.net> http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980119150828.18158A-100000>