Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 19:14:08 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu> To: Victor Manuel Carranza Gonzalez <victor@usac.edu.gt> Cc: FreeBSD Questions mailing list <questions@freefall.freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ld.so and 3.0-SNAP Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980121191340.5616B-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.96.980121192218.23265A-100000@ns.usac.edu.gt>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 21 Jan 1998, Victor Manuel Carranza Gonzalez wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jan 1998, Doug White wrote: > > > You need to reinstall the related package/port. Which library was > > reported missing? > > One of them was libtermcap.so.2.1 > In fact, I found that the missing libraries were the ones with names > ending with .2.1, and there were similar ones in the system, but named > xxxx.so.3.0, so I made a soft link with the xxx.so.2.1 name and it worked > fine, but I'm sure this is not the real solution... > > By the way, the Pine package was installed from the same 3.0-SNAP CD. > > Is it advisable to use the soft-link method with all future "missing > library" errors? It did never happen before with my 2.1.x and 2.2.5 > boxes. Did you upgrade the userland with your SNAP CD? YOu can't just update the kernel and call it done; you need the new improved libraries too. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980121191340.5616B-100000>