Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 29 Jan 1998 21:50:06 -0800 (PST)
From:      Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu>
To:        Costa Morris <costa@cortx.com>
Cc:        questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Ethernet Cards
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.980129214733.1248u-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu>
In-Reply-To: <01bd2cfb$4dfe5950$0cddcfcf@cman.cortx.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 29 Jan 1998, Costa Morris wrote:

> I am running 2.2.2R and i have a 16bit kingston ehternet card which probes
> as
> NE2000 16 bit.  I host several sites and have a fair amount of traffic.
> 
> i was wondering if i would notice a performance difference if i upgraded to
> a
> 32bit PCI card with all the trimmings. or should i not even bother.  please
> let me know.

Yes, absolutely!  The ISA cards drag more on your CPU; the PCI cards will
make your machine run more efficiently when doing network traffic.  I ran
a NE2000 in my Pentium for ages and lost ping -f wars with PCI ethernet
cards, until I upgraded. >>:->

Kingston and Dayna are very good cards that are supported by FreeBSD and
are inexpensive; the crown jewel is the Intel EtherExpress Pro/100B but
that is more expensive.

PCI Ethernet cards are worth the investment (assuming you have PCI slots
available).

Doug White                              | University of Oregon  
Internet:  dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu    | Residence Networking Assistant
http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite    | Computer Science Major





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980129214733.1248u-100000>