Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 00:22:09 -0500 (EST) From: Matt Behrens <matt@zigg.com> To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Jordan's challenge (imap-uw) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980218001543.15082A-100000@megaweapon.zigg.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Allright, I checked imap-uw out. I can't let Jordan sit there and tell me how lazy I am, even if it's true. :) First, I noted that yes, imap-4.1-BETA does indeed have a bsf target to make for, and was wondering just why we even needed patches in that case. I got it to compile and it seems to work by simply removing all the patch files and commenting out the first line under the do-install target (the one that installs the c-client shared lib, I assume). I tried mboxtest and the imap server, both seem to work OK. pop2 and pop3 most likely work as well. I suppose we'd really want the c-client shared library working, ideally; esp. considering possible high load conditions; but on my little ol' box the statics work just fine. I did note that the Makefile that was patched by patch-ab is nothing short of totally rearranged now, which is probably what was breaking the current port. I won't comment about software maintainers changing file structures so radically and not even changing the tarball name except to say "Yeesh". Matt Behrens <matt@zigg.com> | "Separation of church and state is http://www.zigg.com/ | absolutely essential," they say. Chanop Script Coordinator | Why, then, do they make America's World-Wide FreeNet IRC Network | state religion atheism? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980218001543.15082A-100000>