Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 12:37:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu> To: Studded <Studded@san.rr.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: malloc.h vs. stdlib.h Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980506123642.10811F-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu> In-Reply-To: <35501D69.687C70C5@san.rr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 6 May 1998, Studded wrote: > When compiling someone else's stuff I often see warnings to the effect > of, "warning, this file includes malloc.h which is a bad thing, please > use stdlib.h instead." I am wondering if it's worthwhile to actually > make that change in the software and recompile. Probably. That way we're sure it's using our enhanced malloc instead of a local reimplementation. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980506123642.10811F-100000>