Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 22 May 1998 14:56:12 +0100 (BST)
From:      Ben Cohen <bjc23@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
To:        Stuart Henderson <stuart@internationalschool.co.uk>
Cc:        chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Why installing ports on a computer?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.980522145429.543F-100000@bjc23.trin.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <35656B7B.91723614@internationalschool.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Do ftp.*.freebsd.org support NFS mounting?  If they do (or were
> > adjusted so that they did), then when necessary it would presumably be
> > possible to NFS mount the latest set of ports over /usr/ports.
> 
> the ports collection usually builds in /usr/ports/*/*/work/.. 
                      
Oh, I didn't think of that....

> probably
> better to have a port_add command (or even modified pkg_add that can
> understand .tar.gz of the tree for an individual port, maybe with a
> sysinstall interface) that either ftp's to ftp.*.freebsd.org or mounts
> the cdrom, fetches and unpacks the port information to a temp directory
> and makes. that way, it wouldn't break anything that's already written,
> wouldn't require such a major reorganisation of ports, would free up
> about 30mb, and would give a very useful reduction in the time taken to
> install freebsd - see how long it takes to unpack ports.tar.gz, even
> mounted async :-)

Yes, that sounds better.

Ben.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980522145429.543F-100000>