Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 00:50:07 +0100 (CET) From: "Marco Molteni" <molter@tin.it> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: disapointing security architecture Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990311004326.7116A-100000@nympha> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.05.9903102243200.17395-100000@bagira.iit.bme.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, Janos Mohacsi wrote: [..] > An other point OpenBSD made some steps forward: they have IPSec (PF_KEY > v2 !!). 1. PF_KEY != IPsec. 2. Anyway, FreeBSD has IPsec too. Go get KAME IPv6/IPsec at www.kame.net. FreeBSD IPsec will become a merge of KAME, NRL, INRIA. 3. disappointed about FreeBSD security architecture? Fix it. [..] Marco --- "Hi, I have a Compaq machine running Windows 95. How do I install FreeBSD?" "I'm sorry, this is device driver testing: brain implants are two doors down on the right". (Bill Paul, on the freebsd-net mailing list) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.990311004326.7116A-100000>