Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 20:51:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex <garbanzo@hooked.net> To: Kris Kennaway <kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au> Cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, Alexander Sanda <entropy@compufit.at>, wwoods@cybcon.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc 2.8 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.00.9808222049480.16136-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.90.980823120950.31642A-100000@mercury>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 23 Aug 1998, Kris Kennaway wrote: [...] > > Agreed, we need better C++ support. But obtaining it at the price of > > damaging the operating system itself is not a tradeoff I think any of > > us would be happy with. > > For the record, most of the C++ stuff in the source tree is not compilable > with egcs..from memory the other parts which I have to compile with gcc > are due to extra compiler warnings which cause compilation to fail (i.e. > warnings treated as errors), the lkms (egcs doesnt have -aout) and the > biosboot stuff (exceeds maximum length). This is somewhat bogus. The libg++ and stdc++ in the source tree will be ditched anyways (as they should be), as will lkms. What do you mean that it exceeds maximum length? As for the rest.. I'm sure it's easily fixed. - alex | "Contrary to popular belief, penguins are not the salvation of modern | | technology. Neither do they throw parties for the urban proletariat." | | Powered by FreeBSD http://www.freebsd.org/ | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.00.9808222049480.16136-100000>