Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 11:13:03 -0500 (EST) From: spork <spork@super-g.com> To: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely.de> Cc: Kevin Day <toasty@home.dragondata.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFS thoughts Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.00.9812141110220.28944-100000@super-g.inch.com> In-Reply-To: <19981214073605.20458@cicely.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 14 Dec 1998, Bernd Walter wrote: > I saw the same on my private hosts. > Everythings the same to your case instead that I have a 100MBit FreeBSD Router > between them. All lines are running Full-Duplex Point-to-Point. > In my case I have a syslogentry telling me about a server down under some load > and it took minutes till it says that the server is up again. > It happend when using NFS3/TCP at this moment I'm using NFS2/UDP and it won't > hang. Ditto. Two machines back-to-back 100Mbit full duplex. Private NFS network. Migrating from 3/tcp to 2/udp seems to help alot. Can anyone else help confirm that in general 2/udp is the most dependable way to run if you're not traversing anything slower than 100Mb? I also haven't seen the "I've mounted soft and intr, yet things still hang" behaviour using version 2 and udp. Any consensus on that? Thanks, Charles > Another issue is that when using NFS with multihomed hosts the client ask on > one IP address of the server and the server replies using another of his IPs, > so the client is discarding the answers and still waiting. yuck. Charles > > > > > > Kevin > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > > -- > B.Walter > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.00.9812141110220.28944-100000>