Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 11:08:13 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu> To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Running Sybase... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9809251052460.1314-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu> In-Reply-To: <199809250653.XAA00781@word.smith.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 24 Sep 1998, Mike Smith wrote: > You're definitely using the standard kdump - getdomainname is syscall > 162, but under Linux that's nanosleep(), and what you're seeing there > looks about right for an idle applications. Ahh, things make much more sense now with linux_kdump! So now the question is which is easier: moving to 3.0 which has nanosleep() or moving nanosleep() to 2.2.7. Since the former will happen regardless, I'm thinking that will be the easier route...especially since I'm a novice at kernel hacking. -john To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.02A.9809251052460.1314-100000>