Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1998 17:24:34 -0800 (PST) From: Tom <tom@uniserve.com> To: perl <perl@netmug.org> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: has this been fixed? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9811031722090.29296-100000@shell.uniserve.ca> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9811031706340.3459-100000@netmug.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 3 Nov 1998, perl wrote: > Hi, I was wondering if someone has changed the timeout in the wd driver so > that > Nov 3 17:06:17 netmug /kernel: wd2: interrupt timeout: > Nov 3 17:06:17 netmug /kernel: wd2: status 50<rdy,seekdone> error 1<no_dam> > is less common. It is hardware problem. Fix the hardware so it responds faster, and the warning message will disapear. > Or is there a way to keep that from happening? What causes that error? > An IDE timeout, right? You can lengthen the timeout, but this would just hide the problem. Your drive is taking a bit too long to respond. > Thanks, > > Michael Tom Systems Support Uniserve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.02A.9811031722090.29296-100000>