Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 00:45:44 +0100 (CET) From: Andrzej Bialecki <abial@nask.pl> To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@freebsd.dk> Cc: daeron@Wit401305.student.utwente.nl, shawn@cpl.net, osa@etrust.ru, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: StarOffice-5.0... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9811120040270.12730-100000@korin.warman.org.pl> In-Reply-To: <199811112000.VAA00590@freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 11 Nov 1998, Søren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > > Yes, I've got the diffs against relatively fresh current. BTW, I asked > > this question on -emulation, but got back a profound silence... Can we/ > > should we incorporate this patch, and hide it under a kernel option, say > > PROCFS_CMDLINE? The life would be soooo easier for people new to our linux > > emulation... > > Hmm, if we should have a Linsux compatible /proc, it really should be > a beast mounted on /compat/linux/proc. If you provide this, I'm sure > it will be received with open arms :) I proposed some option which is within my reach (considering my skills and time available). If not - well, the issue will have to wait until either my abilities become appropriate, or someone else will take it over. As it is now, I propose the above hack as a temporary solution. Andrzej Bialecki -------------------- ++-------++ ------------------------------------- <abial@nask.pl> ||PicoBSD|| FreeBSD in your pocket? Go and see: Research & Academic |+-------+| "Small & Embedded FreeBSD" Network in Poland | |TT~~~| | http://www.freebsd.org/~picobsd/ -------------------- ~-+==---+-+ ------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.02A.9811120040270.12730-100000>