Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 16:41:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com> Cc: Chia-liang Kao <clkao@CirX.ORG>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernel thread support Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10006161640030.2928-100000@semuta.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <20000616144259.Q47268@blitz.canonware.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 16 Jun 2000, Jason Evans wrote: > On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 03:19:56AM +0800, Chia-liang Kao wrote: > > o Is the model for the scenario described in > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/threads/ > > > > the final design decision? (then I think it shall be well documented.) > > We have made some refinements to the model, but in general, it is the same > idea. Daniel Eischen and I are working on a paper that gives a reasonable > overview of the current design. Hopefully we can get it to a postable form > in the near future. However, we're probably going to concern ourselves > primarily with actually doing the work, rather than telling everybody > beforehand exactly how we're doing it. Can please spend some effort into saying what the intents and architecture is in the paper? The current newbus stuff and CAM stuff horribly suffer from the fact that there aren't such documents. I'm currently tearing my hair out trying to intuit what should have been written down. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.10006161640030.2928-100000>