Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 10:44:24 -0500 (EST) From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@hotjobs.com> To: "David E. Cross" <crossd@phoenix.cs.rpi.edu> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: O_SYNC Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811081043010.19817-100000@porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net> In-Reply-To: <199811072154.QAA00324@phoenix.cs.rpi.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes, however every other OS defines it at "O_SYNC" why are we different? or, if there is a reason, why isn't there a compatibility #define? can someone check this on netbsd/open bsd/os ? is it bsd or us? Alfred Perlstein - Programmer, HotJobs Inc. - www.hotjobs.com -- There are operating systems, and then there's FreeBSD. -- http://www.freebsd.org/ 3.0-current On Sat, 7 Nov 1998, David E. Cross wrote: > Is 'O_FSYNC" what you are looking for? > > #define O_FSYNC 0x0080 /* synchronous writes */ > > > -- > David Cross > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9811081043010.19817-100000>