Date: Sun, 7 Feb 1999 19:18:47 -0800 (PST) From: Alex Zepeda <garbanzo@hooked.net> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> Cc: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, nsouch@FreeBSD.ORG, wpaul@FreeBSD.ORG, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Regarding tcpdump and plip Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902071916440.36056-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org> In-Reply-To: <xzp90e9brl4.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8 Feb 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > I'd really, *really* like to rip out the lpt driver, since its > functionality is completely duplicated by the nlpt and lpip drivers, > which seem pretty stable now. Keeping the lpt driver will only result > in slowing down ppbus development. I don't think ppbus + nlpt + plip > is significantly larger than lpt, so size is not an argument. But doesn't ppbus depend on the SCSI code? I can imagine something like PicoBSD might not want tha that extra bloat.. I know the GENERIC kernel already has the SCSI support compiled in... - alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9902071916440.36056-100000>