Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 15:25:03 -0500 (EST) From: <mike@seidata.com> To: andrewr <andrewr@slack.net> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, jbowie@slack.net Subject: Re: disapointing security architecture Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9903111504320.29076-100000@ns1.seidata.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96.990311121039.6524A-100000@brooklyn.slack.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, andrewr wrote: > So, I do extend this offer, if you are interested in doing an audit or > delve into the security implementations that FreeBSD has/does not have, Here, here. Finally, this thread takes a useful turn. ;) I am extremely interested in the security development of the FreeBSD system. I'd be willing to dedicate server resources (mailing lists, archives, shell accounts, whatever) to such a project... as others are, I'm sure. > forum for this and not much more. I know of a few people already that do > personal kernel modifications for increased security measures I encourage > you to participate. A forum for exchange of such information would be very useful, but what is the purpose of -security (announces/fixes only?). There's also the already substantial list of helpful resources provided by http://www.freebsd.org/security/security.html. Also, there was an auditing project underway (forget the URL)... I agree we need to be active and work together on this, but we don't want to waste time reinventing the wheel or redoing what other projects have already accomplished. Later, -Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9903111504320.29076-100000>