Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 10:06:00 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@freebsd.org>, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha autoconf.c src/sys/alpha/conf files.alpha src/sys/alpha/include chipset.h cpuconf.h cpufunc.h src/sys/alpha/isa isavar.h isa.c src/sys/alpha/pci apecs_pci.c cia_pci.c lca_pci.c apecs.c cia.c lca.c pcibus.c src/sys/alpha/tc ... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9904171003200.51054-100000@herring.nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9904170843370.51054-100000@herring.nlsystems.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 17 Apr 1999, Doug Rabson wrote: > On Fri, 16 Apr 1999, Warner Losh wrote: > > > In message <199904162122.OAA43338@freefall.freebsd.org> Peter Wemm writes: > > : Bring the 'new-bus' to the i386. > > > > Cool. What problems do I need to document in the UPDATING file? > > The declaration of atkbd and psm should look like this: > > device atkbd0 at atkbdc? irq 1 > device psm0 at atkbdc? irq 12 > > I can't think of anything else right now but I'm sure there must be > something. I just thought of something. At the moment, machines with more than one host-pci bridge will not probe the second bus. We need to write code which can recognise the second bridge and arrange to probe it. The other difference from current is that devices are probed in 'depth first' order instead of 'breadth first'. For machines with pci-pci bridges, this could change the unit numbers of some devices. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9904171003200.51054-100000>