Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 10:44:44 +0400 (MSD) From: "Ilmar S. Habibulin" <ilmar@ints.ru> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> Cc: posix1e@cyrus.watson.org, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: secure deletion Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9905221042250.25097-100000@ws-ilmar.ints.ru> In-Reply-To: <xzpwvy2pax2.fsf@localhost.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 21 May 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Because a mount option can be changed at runtime, whereas a kernel > option cannot. A mount option would allow you to enable the security > feature on file systems which need it but not on file systems which do > not need it, whereas a kernel option would enable it unconditionally > on all file systems. And what about it? I just don't understand why this option must be fs-specific. If file have no flag, it would be deleted in ordinary way. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9905221042250.25097-100000>