Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 14:28:09 -0500 (EST) From: <up@3.am> To: "Sumbry][" <sumbry@affinity.net> Cc: Mitch Vincent <mitch@venux.net>, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Jordon Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10003141425050.19606-100000@richard2.pil.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.20.0003141035280.3916-100000@sql.ahnet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Sumbry][ wrote: > > I saw on slashdot the other day where the FreeBSD 4 release was suppose to > > happen "Very soon" -- with other comments liike " > > FreeBSD 4 should go gold on March 13th", I see now that it hasn't happened > > but wondered if perhaps that has been a date set? > > > > I've got a nice box waiting for the 4.0, we're going to have to install RC3 > > if the stable 4.0 isn't released soon.. > > From my understanding it's already happened, cept that it's a RELEASE > version, and not stable. Then why does the website still advertise 3.4 with virtually no mention of 4.0 on the Walnut Creek home page? I just placed an order for 4.0; but it's on backorder with no ETA. > I've always run STABLE on my production servers, but what are the > drawbacks to running a RELEASE? AFAIK, RELEASE is just a snapshot of STABLE. IOW, STABLE is the most up-to-date version of the release, and hence isn't available on CDROM. James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor up@3.am http://3.am ========================================================================= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.10003141425050.19606-100000>