Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 16:31:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Seth <seth@freebie.dp.ny.frb.org> To: Donald Wilde <dwilde1@thuntek.net> Cc: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Benchmarking web apps on Apache Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907081629200.98016-100000@freebie.dp.ny.frb.org> In-Reply-To: <378506C7.BB772E44@thuntek.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hold up a sec. FreeBSD did NOT perform as well. Check the stats again. The only things FreeBSD beat the other OS in was serving STATIC pages (and mod_perl handler stuff). The "crucial" tests (dynamic content via cgi's) showed the other OS to edge out our beloved FreeBSD. SB On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Donald Wilde wrote: > I wasn't concerned with his methodology, Bill, although I noticed the > three points you make in a cursory glance. I would suspect it's #1 > that's the reason FBSD works better. My only reason for the cross-post > is that FreeBSD came out better. If we recall the vanished gartner group > report, they came out with a more than 15% improvement for FreeBSD. > > -- > Donald Wilde "Bringing the Internet to everyone!" > Wilde Media > PMB 117, 1380 Rio Rancho Blvd SE v: 505-771-0709 f: 771-1356 > Rio Rancho, New Mexico 87124 web: http://www.Wilde-Media.com > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9907081629200.98016-100000>