Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 19:51:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola <billf@jade.chc-chimes.com> To: Ryan <ryan@ryan.org> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Are certain parts of kernel not using suser() when they should? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9908241950010.14447-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990824172943.3756A-100000@ryan.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Ryan wrote: > Grepping through the kernel source tree, one finds these 12 files that use > "uid == 0" checks instead of the usual suser(). There may be more than one > instance per function/macro: [...] > Is there a reason for these checks not to use suser? No. Eivind Eklund was working this according the FreeBSD projects page (eivind@FreeBSD.org). I don't know the implication of this, would this impact phk's jail routines? -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9908241950010.14447-100000>