Date: Sat, 9 Oct 1999 12:48:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Behrens <matt@zigg.com> To: Jacques Vidrine <n@nectar.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: merging current's jail functionality to stable Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910091247260.25227-100000@megaweapon.zigg.com> In-Reply-To: <19991009160651.314441D87@bone.nectar.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 9 Oct 1999, Jacques Vidrine wrote: : I forgot one more, which is probably the most desirable if there : are a significant number of 3rd-party binaries to support: : = Don't change suser, but bring in the rest of the changes needed : for jail (add suser_xxx and update the 16 or so files that need : the new semantics). This means that suser in -STABLE and -CURRENT : are still different (as it is today), but it puts of breaking : binary compatibility until 4.0-RELEASE. Is suser needed to properly support jail? Without suser being updated, will we have a hole in the implementation? Matt Behrens <matt@zigg.com> Owner/Administrator, zigg.com Chief Engineer, Nameless IRC Network To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9910091247260.25227-100000>