Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 23:02:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@scc.nl>, Jake Burkholder <jake@checker.org> Subject: Re: rfork patch, please comment Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910282302270.11610-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <199910290450.WAA02527@mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
but it will give us the inputus to produce something actually written down. On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, Nate Williams wrote: > > Actually the kernel side of it would be quite quick.. > > there is a user side component that multiplexes the user threads onto the > > kernel threads but it's actually pretty straight forward. > > > > We may try give a bit of a talk about it a t teh next Bay Area freeBS > > User's Group meeting.. As well as dicuss the other possibilities. > > That'll give us a reason to get our act together. :-) > > Except that 99% of the FreeBSD developers don't got the the User's group > meeting in the Bay Area. > > > > Nate > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9910282302270.11610-100000>