Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 20:28:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> To: Ben Rosengart <ben@skunk.org> Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: -stable to -current Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910292027430.12517-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.20.9910291303050.87707-100000@penelope.skunk.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 29 Oct 1999, Ben Rosengart wrote: > On Fri, 29 Oct 1999, Doug White wrote: > > > I still hate the way the signal change was handled. > > How would you have done it differently? As I understand it, the pain > was more or less inevitable. Perhaps, but there must be a way to keep gcc from dying. I don't fully understand the mechanics involved so I will shut up until I teach myself about the syscall handling and concoct a better solution :) Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9910292027430.12517-100000>