Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 22:09:07 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com> To: "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc@iMach.com> Cc: Marcin Cieslak <saper@system.pl>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: speaking of 3.4... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911252207540.22937-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.991125105436.21715A-100000@workhorse.iMach.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 25 Nov 1999, Forrest W. Christian wrote: > What I'd propose is one additional "track". "Branch" is the typical name for these things. I'll just offer that bitrot is a serious reason why we don't need another branch. As for 'missioncritical', we simply call it 'errata'. -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9911252207540.22937-100000>