Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 12:37:02 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Bartol <bartol@salk.edu> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Serious server-side NFS problem Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912161235060.36287-100000@eccles.salk.edu> In-Reply-To: <199912162024.NAA73705@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <16722.945365564@critter.freebsd.dk> Poul-Henning Kamp writes: > : If people do a "settimeofday" we change the boot time since the > : amount of time we've been up *IS* known for sure, whereas the boottime > : is only an estimate. > > There is one problem with this. The amount of uptime isn't the same > as the amount of time since the machine booted. How can this happen? > When a laptop suspends, it doesn't update the update while it is > asleep, nor does it update the uptime by the amount of time that has > been slept. IS this a bug in the apm code? > > Warner > IIRC it does update uptime properly after a suspend in 2.2.8 but does not do so in 3.X and -current on my ThinkPad 770. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9912161235060.36287-100000>