Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 13:02:23 +0000 (GMT) From: Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: "Joerg B. Micheel" <joerg@begemot.org>, "Steven M. Schultz" <sms@moe.2bsd.com>, pups@minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au, FreeBSD Chat <chat@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Sun release source code for Solaris 8 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001271255430.48240-100000@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <20000127153820.T53307@freebie.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Message too convoluted to tell who actually wrote this....but i believe Greg wrote the second group of lines.... >> That would make quite an interesting test. How much does >> ftp.cdrom.com gain by running FreeBSD instead of Solaris ? > >Good question. My guess is that Solaris 2 just couldn't handle that >many connections, but it compete reasonably well with fewer >connections (say 1000). I'll copy the FreeBSD chat people and see >what they think. Interestingly, i noticed recently that the response time on usa.net seemed much slower. It appears consistently so, either by ppp connection or by network/T1 line. A few months ago, netcraft showed that they were running FreeBSD. Guess what they are running now? Yup... SOlaris. I dropped them a line saying i noticed the speed difference. -=> jm <=- "I've done questionable things, also extraordinary things.... Revel in your time!" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0001271255430.48240-100000>