Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 00:28:17 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org> To: "Jeroen C. van Gelderen" <jeroen@vangelderen.org> Cc: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/miscfs/linprocfs linprocfs_misc.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003270026440.6527-100000@green.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <38DEB0E4.C8DA5F6C@vangelderen.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Jeroen C. van Gelderen wrote: > > And then when some Linux app wants to use the part of procfs implemented > > in procfs but not linprocfs? > > One would expect Linux apps to use Linux features only. If they use > FreeBSD specifics they might as well run natively, no? > > Anyway, I'm more worried about yet another cryptix name being > introduced. Why not linux_procfs? I'll restate it, hopefully more clearly. How's this: And then when some Linux app wants to use parts of procfs that are implemented in both Linux native procfs and FreeBSD native procfs, but which are not in FreeBSD native linprocfs? > Cheers, > Jeroen > -- > Jeroen C. van Gelderen - jeroen@vangelderen.org > Kick-ass crypto for you: http://www.cryptix.org -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! / green@FreeBSD.org `------------------------------' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0003270026440.6527-100000>