Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:46:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton <Doug@gorean.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, Robin Melville <robmel@innotts.co.uk>, stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 4.0, OpenSSL and MD5 (fwd) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004131644310.11928-100000@dt051n0b.san.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <200004132336.RAA49054@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004131616150.45420-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> Kris Kennaway writes:
> : .if exists(${.CURDIR}/../../secure) && !defined(NOCRYPT) &&
> : !defined(NOSECURE) && !defined(NO_OPENSSL) && !defined(RELEASE_CRUNCH)
>
> .if exists(${.CURDIR}/../../secure) && ${NO_CRYPT} != "no" && \
> ${NO_SECURE} != "no" && ${NO_OPENSSL} != "no" && ${RELEASE_CRUNCH} == "yes"
>
> seems to be about the same to me and easier to read.
Just keep in mind that we would need to (read, "should") throw in
. . . && ${NO_CRYPT} != "no" && ${NO_CRYPT} != "NO"
for each option. Of course, I'm still in favor of having the values be
tested (I think that violoates POLA less than the status quo).
Doug
--
Excess on occasion is exhilarating. It prevents moderation from
acquiring the deadening effect of a habit.
-- W. Somerset Maugham
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0004131644310.11928-100000>