Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 13:57:05 -0600 (CST) From: Ryan Thompson <ryan@sasknow.com> To: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed to 5.x and 4.x wednesday Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004231353400.68963-100000@ren.sasknow.com> In-Reply-To: <200004231947.NAA08296@nomad.yogotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Numerous cross-posts and CC's removed Nate Williams wrote to Poul-Henning Kamp: > > > Core should consider reverting the special rules that were originally > > > created with the expectation of major breakage in 5.x back to > > > the set of rules we had for 3.x and 4.x. > > > > I have no idea what special rules you are talking about for 4.x/5.x. > > > > 4.x-stable is a -stable tree and shall be treated as such. > > I was under the impression that 4.x hasn't been designated as the stable > branch (yet). That will happen when 4.1 is released, but until that > happens 3.x is still considered the -stable release. > > Nate Nate, 4.0 is indeed -STABLE. Some (myself included) are simply staying with 3.4 on production machines until a few of the bugs have been shaken out of 4.0 (though there haven't been many!) Therefore, many individuals are recommending a wait until 4.1 before switching to RELENG_4. Virtually yours, - Ryan -- Ryan Thompson <ryan@sasknow.com> Systems Administrator, Accounts Phone: +1 (306) 664-1161 SaskNow Technologies http://www.sasknow.com #106-380 3120 8th St E Saskatoon, SK S7H 0W2 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0004231353400.68963-100000>