Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 08:57:15 +1200 (NZST) From: Dan Langille <dan@freebsddiary.org> To: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: where did mail/qpopper3 come from? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005310854080.59192-100000@ducky.nz.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20000530164958.B22499@argon.gryphonsoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 30 May 2000, Will Andrews wrote: > On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 08:43:25AM +1200, Dan Langille wrote: > > I noticed in my latest cvsup: > > > > Mkdir ports/mail/popper3/patches > > Create ports/mail/popper3/patches/patch-aa,v > > Create ports/mail/popper3/patches/patch-ab,v > > Create ports/mail/popper3/patches/patch-ac,v > > etc... > > > > But I see nothing in cvs-all pertaining to this. But checking > > cvs, I see that popper and popper3 appear to be mirror images (at least > > wrt the most recent commits). > > > > My question: should this "new" port have appeared in cvs-all? > > It is a repository copy. Repo-copies don't occur in a normal manner > (i.e. w/ cvs commit), but rather a cvs meister (i.e. Asami-san) must > copy the files directly in the repository. OK. That tells me what it is. I suspect the answer to my question is no. Then why do we have both popper and popper3? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0005310854080.59192-100000>