Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2000 12:58:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Adam <bsdx@looksharp.net> To: Doug Barton <DougB@gorean.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, dillon@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /tmp on a ramdisk? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007301256250.77768-100000@turtle.looksharp.net> In-Reply-To: <398223FF.17B737A7@gorean.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, Doug Barton wrote: >Ted Sikora wrote: >> >> A while ago several people suggested using /tmp on a ramdisk along with >> softupdates. Right now I am running several production servers with >> 4.1-STABLE with softupdates. I'm really happy with the performance. What >> benefits would I realize using /tmp on a ramdisk? > > CW on this is varied, but the current trend is that /tmp on a md is just a >waste of ram, since (basically) everything in /tmp is in ram twice. > >Doug I thought that was MFS only and that MD took care of that issue? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0007301256250.77768-100000>