Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 16 Aug 2000 01:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Dirk Meyer <dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Indicating patch levels
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008160104060.90191-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <uj/HALBCtu@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
(Please don't remove me from the subject line unless you want me to
overlook the mail :-)

On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Dirk Meyer wrote:

> Can we handle thsi with PKGNAMESUFFIX ?
> I would not like to have "-0" added to any port.
> But I would like to use an extension if a port has a major Fix.

This is a fair suggestion - bsd.port.mk could only append the suffix if
it's >0 (I still prefer numerical revisions than arbitrarily-named
extensions - what happens if you have a secfix and a FreeBSD-specific
enhancement, do you call it -secfix1-enh1 or something? :)

Kris

--
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
    -- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0008160104060.90191-100000>