Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 01:05:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Dirk Meyer <dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Indicating patch levels Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008160104060.90191-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <uj/HALBCtu@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
(Please don't remove me from the subject line unless you want me to overlook the mail :-) On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Dirk Meyer wrote: > Can we handle thsi with PKGNAMESUFFIX ? > I would not like to have "-0" added to any port. > But I would like to use an extension if a port has a major Fix. This is a fair suggestion - bsd.port.mk could only append the suffix if it's >0 (I still prefer numerical revisions than arbitrarily-named extensions - what happens if you have a secfix and a FreeBSD-specific enhancement, do you call it -secfix1-enh1 or something? :) Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0008160104060.90191-100000>