Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 22 Jan 2001 21:00:41 +1100 (EST)
From:      Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To:        Andy Farkas <andyf@speednet.com.au>
Cc:        bauerp <bauerp@bigfoot.com>, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: serial port problems
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101222056080.28114-100000@besplex.bde.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101201115420.25091-100000@backup.af.speednet.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Andy Farkas wrote:

> On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > The driver already does an unreasonable amount of checking at probe
> > time that the ports work.  It even checks that interrupts work.
> > Non-working interrupts caused the probe to fail in FreeBSD-2, but now
> > certain types of broken interrupts only result in a boot message like
> > "configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0".  I don't know how
> > this particular failure would cause a lockup.

> Well, I think something is wrong with the probe, 'cause this machine does
> not have any serial ports (it used to) yet says:
> 
> ...
> FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE #0: Sat Oct 14 19:20:47 EST 2000
> ...
> sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0
> sio0: type 8250
> ...
> 
> The probe did not pick up the fact that there is no serial port.
> 
> This is an old dual P90 MB with no onboard coms or lpt.

I don't see how it can get that far without there being something very
much like an 8250 at port 0x3f8, unless the undocumented no-probe flag
(0x40000) somehow gets set.  The flag is only supposed to be set
internally for pccards.  It's interesting that only an 8250 is found.

Bruce



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0101222056080.28114-100000>