Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 09:00:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.ORG>, Andrew Kenneth Milton <akm@theinternet.com.au>, Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: devfs deficiencies (was: devfs and Vinum (was: any -current && vinum problems?)) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0108170859470.22899-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <3B7CD25F.703F6D4D@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Terry Lambert wrote: > Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > Julian Elischer writes: > > > > >Well you timed them out without askling the developer what he had in the > > >wings and that was more than impolite, it was stupid, because most of the > > >shortcomings of devfs and SLICE had been solved and all I was waiting for > > >was the CAM switchover, so that I didn't have to do everything twice. you don't even think it was implolite? > > > > Yeah, and together with Terrys VFS patches that would have made Microsoft > > bankrupt overnight. > > > > Sure... > > Hardly; many of my VFS patches were designed to make the > code more portable... for instance, to Windows 95, where they > ran without problems starting ~1995/1996... > > -- Terry > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0108170859470.22899-100000>