Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 23:21:38 +0200 (CEST) From: aaron <aaron@meta.lo-res.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: openbios Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0108282317240.51413-100000@meta.lo-res.org> In-Reply-To: <20010828161038.N81307@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * aaron <aaron@meta.lo-res.org> [010828 15:37] wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > I have been wondering if fbsd people would like to move into the > > openbios.org direction? Well, at least I for myself would _dream_ of > > booting my laptop and have X running in 10 seconds :)) > > > > I am asking because AFAIK the openbios guys replace the standard bios > > calls with their own code (kernel, whatever). So would this acutally be > > possible in fbsd? Are there any calls to bios routines or is everything > > coded by hand? > > > > sorry if this is a bit off-topic. I was just to curious... > > I'm pretty sure openbios just aims to be a replacement for PC-BIOSes, > as long as it's a drop in replacement FreeBSD should run just fine > on top of it, there shouldn't be any modifications needed to be done > to FreeBSD. yes, but AFAIK they will replace standard BIOS calls with their own abstraction layer/calls. Now if fbsd uses some "well known" BIOS calls which differ in the openbios abstraction layer then it wont run. so the question boils down to: is there some black magic bios call accessing code in the kernel somewhere (which might break then)? aaron. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0108282317240.51413-100000>