Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 20:05:49 +0400 (MSD) From: Igor Sysoev <is@rambler-co.ru> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libthr and 1:1 threading. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0304031934010.32175-100000@is> In-Reply-To: <3E8C437F.2C81306D@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: > I have to ask: > > Why is it so important to people that the libthr performance > gains be impossible to achieve without use of the 1:1 model, > rather than a modification of libc_r, or avoidance of existing > kernel latencies? If you mean that "people" is my humble person then I want to say that I am not against 1:1 model libthr, KSE's M:N model, current or improved libc_r, rfork()ed LinuxThreads and any possible future threads implementation. My last emails were caused only by your incorrect statements about a non-blocking behaviour of Solaris disk files. Igor Sysoev http://sysoev.ru/en/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0304031934010.32175-100000>